PG&E has informed state regulators that it experienced an incident early Thursday on a major electrical transmission line at a remote site in Butte County just minutes before the reported start of the devastating Camp Fire.
In a brief report filed with the California Public Utilities Commission, the company said a power outage was recorded on its 115-kilovolt Caribou-Palermo line at 6:15 a.m. Thursday. Cal Fire says the blaze started at 6:29 a.m.
Driven by high winds in the Feather River Canyon, the Camp Fire raced west, destroying parts of the the communities of Paradise and Magalia. So far, nine people are confirmed dead in the fire, which had burned a staggering 6,453 homes and 90,000 acres by nightfall Friday.
PG&E’s brief report said that an aerial patrol was sent to survey the transmission line — actually three lines strung across high-rise steel towers on the west side of the Feather River — hours after the fire started. The report says the patrol observed a damaged transmission tower about a mile northeast of a resort called Pulga.
It’s not clear from the report whether the damage occurred before or after the fire began, and a company spokesman did not address that question.
But the location identified in the report appears to be very close to the spot where firefighters first encountered the blaze.
In a story published Friday, the Bay Area News group reported that Cal Fire crews arriving on the scene reported seeing vegetation burning “on the west side of the river underneath the transmission lines.”
According to the Bay Area News Group, fire crews made that report from Poe Dam. The dam is about eight-tenths of a mile northeast of Pulga.
Cal Fire spokesman Scott McLean said Friday that the cause of the fire is still under investigation, but added that the agency is “looking into all possibilities including electrical equipment failure.”
Jason King, a PG&E spokesman, emphasized that the report is preliminary, that the cause of the fire has not been determined and that the company is fully cooperating with Cal Fire as the agency investigates the blaze.
CPUC spokeswoman Terrie Prosper said commission staff is reviewing the information from PG&E
“CPUC staff will incorporate PG&E’s incident report on the Camp Fire into its investigation to assess the compliance of electrical facilities with applicable rules and regulations in fire impacted areas,” Prosper said in an emailed statement.
“The staff investigation may include an inspection of the fire sites once Cal Fire allows access, as well as maintenance of facilities, vegetation management and emergency preparedness and response.” she said.
PG&E has been under intense scrutiny after a series of disasters for which it has been found responsible, including the 2010 San Bruno pipeline explosion and a series of catastrophic wildfires.
Those blazes include the 2015 Butte Fire, a 70,000-acre blaze in Calaveras and Amador counties that killed two people and destroyed 500 homes. Cal Fire said the utility’s poor maintenance of trees along power lines led to the fire. The company’s liability in the fire has been estimated at $1 billion or more.
The highest-profile blazes PG&E has been blamed occurred during the October 2017 fire that swept the North Bay and other parts of Northern California.
Cal Fire investigators have determined that 16 of those fires involved the company’s electrical equipment: with snapped poles, slumping or falling power lines, and trees or parts of trees coming into contact with lines sparking fires.
Four of the 2017 fires that PG&E has been blamed for so far — the Redwood (Mendocino County), Atlas (Napa County), Nuns (Sonoma County) and Cascade (Yuba County) — accounted for 22 of the 44 deaths during the fire siege.
Investigators have not yet released a cause for the dealiest, most destructive North Bay blaze — the Tubbs Fire, which killed 22 people and destroyed more than 5,000 homes in and around Santa Rosa.
The October 2017 fires caused an estimated $10 billion in insured losses. The magnitude of the disaster — and PG&E’s possible liability — prompted the company to lobby the Legislature for relief.
The result was legislation, signed in September by Gov. Jerry Brown, that will allow the company to pass on some of its fire-related costs to customers. The law will also allow the CPUC to consider a broad range of factors — including weather conditions, a utility’s efforts to prevent fires and findings of mismanagement — in deciding whether fire-related costs can be charged to ratepayers.